Constructionist learning – refinding my Teaching mojo

Theo van Doesburg’s painting Counter-composition XII, 1925/26, from Constructive Concepts by Willy Rotzler – Photo by Alki1, on Flickr

At the moment I am really enjoying a reader I acquired over the Christmas holidays called “Digital Literacies: Social Learning and Classroom practices” edited by Victoria Carrington and Muriel Robinson.  I think I might use this book as the basis for doing some blogging.  Unlike my rather poor attempt to blog about the systems life cycle and games design this at least affords me the opportunity to dip in and out of the book whenever I like.

In the first essay by Rebekah Willett entitled “Young People’s Video Productions as New Sites of Learning” she outlines a story about a pupil called Jacob who creates his own multimedia DVD with menus and animations and soundtracks.  Although obviously an anecdotal example of learning she applies an interesting theory of learning to describe how this pupil has progressed through his project (Willett 2009).  She calls it constructionist learning which from what I see on Wikipedia is inspired by Constructivism and although it is perhaps not a good idea to use a simplistic definition of constructionism it is perhaps best understood as ‘learning by making’ (Papert and Harel 1991) or learning by creating objects in the real world.

I would be quite happy as a digital educator to extend that definition of learning by making in the real world to include learning by making in the virtual world.  This is where ICT as a subject can come in quite nicely.

For years now my teaching in ICT has consisted of a rather traditional model of “Here is how you do a spreadsheet – use the data I provide you or gather some yourself within the strict confines of the task I set you” or “Here is how you create a database … ” – you get the picture.  As a form of teaching it sucks, my pedagogy is behind the times and frankly I am bored of the approach and my pupils are probably bored too.  I have definitely felt for a while that a refresh is needed and taking a constructionist approach to my teaching and the learning which takes place in class could be a start.

How to do this is the more tricky part.  My initial plan is to start rewriting my ICT curriculum to focus less on just simply rote demonstrations of skills and more on creative ‘constructionist’ long running projects through which skills can be taught.  This I feel would teach pupils to adhere more to a standard systems life cycle (or even an updated Rapid Application Development life cycle) and would turn skills acquisition into a more relevant process for pupils.

As pupils are going to be constructing their learning through the projects they work on they will be learning through their own doing in lessons – an important point does come up then which is do I as a teacher still need to teach? Willett does essentially ask this question in her essay, through her analysis of the digital video editing case study she is writing about, as to whether if pupils are learning the skills necessary to complete a project does a teacher still need to teach?

My answer to this is that definitely traditional teacher led learning will still need to take place to ensure that key conceptual elements are taught.  Even if pupils are creating their own learning through activities like games programming, digital video editing and the like I still think it is important for teachers to provide contexts and help pupils to see natural and relevant boundaries to what they are doing.

In conclusion I certainly hope that my new curriculum will begin to yield a far more exciting and ‘constructive’ (I had to get that in) approach to ICT learning which should hopefully encourage more pupils to see it as a relevant subject.

The Google generation

I’ve been doing a unit on internet research techniques with my year
7′s when a question came up about how long Google had been around. I
asked them when they had mostly been born and they all said mostly
late 1998 or 1999. I looked up Google on Wikipedia as I recalled they
had started sometime in the late 90′s and I found that they had begun
on the 4th September 1998.

This meant my year 7′s are the first class I have ever taught who
were all born after Google was founded. I realise primary school’s
have been teaching the Google generation for a number of years now but
this is certainly the first year for secondary schools.

Google may not have had a direct effect on them or their parents for
the first couple of years of their existence but as a company which
has defined the Internet for the last decade or so we have come to
expect much of our online lives to be shaped by what they do. How is
knowing this about my current year 7′s going to affect me as a
teacher? Probably not by much as these girls are just another
generation of digital natives coming through and it is up to this old
digital immigrant to see that they are looked after as much as
possible.

My response to @WiredUK post on iPad being the death of creation in schools #ipadedu

Recently the Geekdad writer on Wired (who I follow regularly) posted an interesting article on whether the iPad is the death of creation.

The article can be found here:

I agree with his concerns and I think he has raised a valid point.  I think it's quite possible to come to the conclusion that Apple users have now become sheep who avidly consume all content which appears the App store.  I myself am a case in point as I spend a fair bit of time working on Angry Birds levels.  The new Motorola Xoom tablet ad shown during the Super Bowl in the states alluded to this as well showing automatons blinkered from the world quite literally through their hoods but also their headphones.  For anyone who missed the  Apple allusion the main character was reading 1984 on his tablet.

As a teacher working on the problem of iPads in education the issue of consumption versus creation is a thorny one.  I would certainly not want to suggest the use of tablets if they were only consumption devices (eg the Kindle which is a pseudo-tablet) but rather if they were used regularly as creation devices.  The Geekdad writer acknowledges that there is some content creation aspect to the iPad but it merely abstracts the nuts and bolts of the technology.  I'm not sure what he is getting at but perhaps the following outline of how to approach the iPand and creation versus consumption may help.

I would propose that in assessing the iPad for school one would need to look at three aspects:
  1. Consumption of Content
  2. Content Creation
  3. Assistance with Content Creation
1.  Consumption of content

This has to happen regardless of how you view the iPad.  One aspect of education itself is being able to make sense of the reams of information available to one and if your device can help you make sense of that then fantastic.  The ability to use the iPad to access information in the form of ebooks, websites, RSS readers etc would be a great way for a pupil to harness what they have available to them.  Doing it using a form factor which is engaging and simple (no keyboard getting in the way) to use is a plus point.

2. Content Creation

Admittedly this is an area which could grow a bit more as the freedom of full desktop applications such as programming or graphic design applications may not be as readily available for the iPad but as the device grows in power and capability this may change.  Certainly there are  applications like Brushes which allow for full scale drawing on the iPad and this is a start.

Where I feel the iPad wins is its ability to allow pupils to easily add straight forward written content on social networks and blogs.  Does this turn it into a glorified typewriter? Possibly but when you consider that these contributions to social networks and blogs open up the avenue towards collaboration with other pupils in not just their own school but other schools as well the iPad becomes a lot more powerful.

3.  Assistance with Content Creation

This aspect I am still thrashing out as I only came up with it in response to the article!  I have seen pictures of iPads being used in various lessons like Art and Drama or being used as a storyboard utility for pupil film editing.  This I feel is a prime example of how the iPad could be used to assist pupils in creating content and work outside of the iPad which has been enhanced or made easier through the use of the iPad.

In conclusion I would say the iPad does have a way to go before it becomes a must use utility in schools.  I am wary of schools which have simply rolled them out and hoped the educational usage will come to them after that – I think that is an irresponsible way of doing it and could probably put off staff and pupils if managed badly.  School's need bullet proof plans for rolling them out especially if one looks at the cost not just of the devices (I can't even afford one yet) but also of the support systems such as Wi-Fi.

Effective and critical questioning from parents such as the sentiments expressed in this article are valid and necessary in being able to see a way forward for iPads.  I hope we get there at some point as I think they are brilliant devices.